495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453721)
1. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
Guerra F; Bortolotti U; Thiene G; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Talenti E; Stellin G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
Kawachi Y; Tanaka J; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes with the epicholorohydrin-modified porcine aortic heart valve: a 15-year follow-up.
Wei X; Yi W; Chen W; Ma X; Lau WB; Wang H; Yi D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1417-24. PubMed ID: 20417754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to eight years.
Munro AI; Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Burr LH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 8000606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient population.
Burdon TA; Miller DC; Oyer PE; Mitchell RS; Stinson EB; Starnes VA; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Feb; 103(2):238-51; discussion 251-2. PubMed ID: 1735989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Six-and-half years' experience with the St. Jude BioImplant porcine prosthesis.
Triggiani M; D'Ancona G; Nascimbene S; Benussi S; Donatelli F; Paolini G; Galli L; Grossi A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9130121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The zero pressure fixed medtronic intact porcine valve: an 8.5 year review.
Barratt-Boyes BG; Jaffe WM; Ko PH; Whitlock RM
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 8269174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
