These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453970)

  • 1. Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.
    de Gelder B; Vroomen J
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Sep; 20(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 1453970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
    Greene RL; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
    Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
    Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
    Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.
    Macken B; Taylor JC; Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():113-124. PubMed ID: 27376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Acoustic memory of the speech evoked by a 22-channel cochlear implant].
    Kumakawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Aug; 94(8):1136-41. PubMed ID: 1960594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli.
    Miles C; Jenkins R
    Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 10889902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ineluctable modality of the audible: perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory.
    Maidment DW; Macken WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):989-97. PubMed ID: 22468724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
    Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information processing by school-age children with specific language impairment: evidence from a modality effect paradigm.
    Gillam RB; Cowan N; Marler JA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Aug; 41(4):913-26. PubMed ID: 9712137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of delayed distraction on the modality effect in free recall.
    Gathercole SE; Gregg VH; Gardiner JM
    Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):223-32. PubMed ID: 6883013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.