These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14550602)

  • 1. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and saline infusion vs. cervical dinoprostone.
    Moini A; Riazi K; Honar H; Hasanzadeh Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Nov; 83(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 14550602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of extra-amniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening.
    Goldman JB; Wigton TR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 93(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 9932568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Durie D; Lawal A; Zegelbone P
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 26341067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour: Excessive, uterine activity is a maternal, neurological emergency.
    Quinn MJ
    BJOG; 2016 Nov; 123(12):2048. PubMed ID: 27753252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study.
    Sherman DJ; Frenkel E; Pansky M; Caspi E; Bukovsky I; Langer R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 11239640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhu L; Zhang C; Cao F; Liu Q; Gu X; Xu J; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e13251. PubMed ID: 30508911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical and mechanical methods for cervical ripening.
    Biron-Shental T; Fishman A; Fejgin MD
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 May; 85(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 15099778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two methods of cervix ripening: intracervical Foley catether and dinoprostone - which one is actually more efficient?
    Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Ciechanowicz P; Saletra A; Szymusik I; Wielgos M
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2015; 36(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 26313393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
    Mussalli NG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):474-5. PubMed ID: 10711569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.
    Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Hughes E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 10787349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; McCullough H; Manley JS; Shlossman PA; Pollock M; Colmorgen GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9914578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second dose of PGE
    Mohr-Sasson A; Schiff E; Sindel O; Suday RR; Kalter-Farber A; Mashiach R; Yinon Y; Dulitzki M; Sivan E; Mazaki-Tovi S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.