These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14550754)

  • 1. New trends in the development of occupational exposure limits for airborne chemicals in China.
    Liang YX; Su Z; Wu WA; Lu BQ; Fu WZ; Yang L; Gu JY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Oct; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 14550754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of occupational exposure limits for chemical substances in China.
    Liang YX; Gang BQ; Gu XQ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 8577951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
    Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulation of occupational exposures in China.
    Wong O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Oct; 38(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 14550753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
    Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific and practical considerations for the development of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for chemical substances.
    Galer DM; Leung HW; Sussman RG; Trzos RJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1992 Jun; 15(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 1509122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States.
    Rappaport SM
    Am J Ind Med; 1993 May; 23(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 8506846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):858-66. PubMed ID: 18381691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The current status of hygiene standard setting for chemical substances in workplaces in China.
    Liang YX; Gu XQ
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Jan; 101(1-2):65-78. PubMed ID: 2057771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Taiwan.
    Shih TS; Wu KY; Chen HI; Chang CP; Chang HY; Huang YS; Liou SH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 16701932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies.
    Maidment SC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 9738436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Industry's perception and use of occupational exposure limits.
    Topping MD; Williams CR; Devine JM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):357-66. PubMed ID: 9738433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
    Gromiec J
    Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
    Schenk L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
    Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. OELs derivation in Poland and in the former Eastern Bloc with reference to approaches and practices applied in the EU.
    Soćko R; Czerczak S; Kupczewska-Dobecka M
    Med Pr; 2015; 66(3):383-92. PubMed ID: 26325051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Status of occupational exposure limits of air toxic substances in the GESTIS Substances Database].
    Zheng SL; Hu C; Huang SL; Xiao XY; Luo L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 42(6):417-425. PubMed ID: 38964905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.