These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14552150)

  • 41. [Digital radiography in tomography of the facial bones].
    Ibing HP; Vogel H; Biebesheimer V
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):362-5. PubMed ID: 3175474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison.
    Trochesset DA; Serchuk RB; Colosi DC
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 24328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [A method for generating dental panoramic radiographs from 3D CT sectional data].
    Zhu J; Wang L; Wang W; Huang Y; Guo H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 28(6):1189-93, 1226. PubMed ID: 22295712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
    Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Comparison of the results of roentgenography, panoramic zonography and computer-aided tomography in some deformations of facial skull].
    Rabukhina NA; Filimonov GP; Luginov NV; Bel'chenko VA; Arzhantsev AP; Khelminskaia NM; Kachanov SM; Lisunkov VI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1997; (1):20-4. PubMed ID: 9133065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Radiology department of the Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery: stages of research work].
    Arzhantsev AP
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2022; 101(4):26-29. PubMed ID: 35943496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dental CT: imaging technique, anatomy, and pathologic conditions of the jaws.
    Gahleitner A; Watzek G; Imhof H
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):366-76. PubMed ID: 12599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Multislice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis].
    Egorova EA; Zorina IS; Sangaeva LM
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2010; (4):18-21. PubMed ID: 22187905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of three-dimensional X-ray images: reconstruction from conventional tomograms, compact computerized tomography images, and multislice helical computerized tomography images.
    Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Ariji E
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 16265853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of the visibility of the anatomical structures of the facial skeleton in panoramic zonography and linear tomography.
    Paukku P; Tötterman S; Hallikainen D; Kinnunen J; Göthlin J
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 6628395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interpretation of panoramic radiographs.
    Perschbacher S
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():40-5. PubMed ID: 22376096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Macdonald-Jankowski DS; Orpe EC
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007; 73(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 17672955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [100 years of radiology in The Netherlands. VIII. Radiology in dentistry].
    Velders XL; Sanderink GC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Dec; 139(48):2472-6. PubMed ID: 8532081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.