These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14552151)

  • 1. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Horasan S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e74-81. PubMed ID: 20031454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
    Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of digital with conventional radiography in detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an ex vivo study.
    Tsesis I; Kamburoğlu K; Katz A; Tamse A; Kaffe I; Kfir A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 18299217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of digital image enhancement on the detection of vertical root fracture.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Pehlivan SY
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20089061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criteria for the assessment of intrinsic performances of digital radiographic intraoral sensors.
    Mondou D; Bonnet E; Coudert JL; Jourlin M; Molteni R; Pachod V
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 8883516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of CCD and CMOS (APS) digital sensors compared with D and E-plus-speed films in the detection of dental pathology: an in vitro study.
    Tsau JN; Mupparapu M
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2001; 101():10-1. PubMed ID: 15484636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High resolution charge-coupled device sensor vs. medium resolution photostimulable phosphor plate digital receptors for detection of root fractures in vitro.
    Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL
    Dent Traumatol; 2005 Feb; 21(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15660754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography.
    Kositbowornchai S; Nuansakul R; Sikram S; Sinahawattana S; Saengmontri S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 11313731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.