248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14552300)
1. A new world order for human experiments.
Moreno JD
Account Res; 2003; 10(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 14552300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent and investigational new drug abuses in the U.S. military.
Cummings ML
Account Res; 2002; 9(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12625353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human experiments and national security: the need to clarify policy.
Moreno JD
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 12764885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Old legacies and new paradigms: confusing "research" and "treatment" and its consequences in responding to emergent health threats.
Javitt GH
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(1):38-70. PubMed ID: 16538801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioethics and the national security state.
Moreno JD
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 15301184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDA seeks public comment on informed consent rules in combat situations.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):43. PubMed ID: 11645003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting the nation's military may include the use of investigational new drugs.
Embrey E
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 14577421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm.
Schuchardt EJ
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical experimentation concerning chemical and biological weapons for mass destruction.
Deutsch E
Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 34(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 16211734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.
Guttman D
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 11660585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Panel of scientists supports review of biomedical research that terrorists could use.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A20. PubMed ID: 14610763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When terrorism threatens health: how far are limitations on personal and economic liberties justified?
Gostin LO
Fla Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 55(5):1105-70. PubMed ID: 15478247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human drugs and biologics; determination that informed consent is NOT feasible or is contrary to the best interests of recipients; revocation of 1990 interim final rule; establishment of new interim final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Interim final rule; opportunity for public comment.
Fed Regist; 1999 Oct; 64(192):54180-9. PubMed ID: 11010702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public health. Rough-and-tumble behind Bush's smallpox policy.
Cohen J; Enserink M
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2312-6. PubMed ID: 12493889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental drugs are linked to ills of Gulf War veterans.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1994 May; ():12. PubMed ID: 11647031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Justiciability--waiving for the flag: should informed consent rules apply in the context of military emergencies?
Seftel SB
George Washington Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 60(5):1387-435. PubMed ID: 16086522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Breakthrough of the year. Bioterrorism: the calm after the storm.
Enserink M
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2300. PubMed ID: 12493879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A military exception to "informed consent": Doe v. Sullivan.
Moran PJ
St Johns Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):847-63. PubMed ID: 11652729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of experimental drugs during national crisis.
Shamoo AE; Campbell JD
Account Res; 2003; 10(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 14552302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
