These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14552845)

  • 1. Institutional decision-making to select patient care devices: identifying venues to promote patient safety.
    Keselman A; Patel VL; Johnson TR; Zhang J
    J Biomed Inform; 2003; 36(1-2):31-44. PubMed ID: 14552845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Institutional decision-making for medical device purchasing: evaluating patient safety.
    Keselman A; Tang X; Patel VL; Johnson TR; Zhang J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1357-61. PubMed ID: 15361036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harnessing hospital purchase power to design safe care delivery.
    Ebben SF; Gieras IA; Gosbee LL
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2008; 42(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 18662073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human factors engineering: a tool for medical device evaluation in hospital procurement decision-making.
    Ginsburg G
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15896694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices.
    Zhang J; Johnson TR; Patel VL; Paige DL; Kubose T
    J Biomed Inform; 2003; 36(1-2):23-30. PubMed ID: 14552844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of a decision analysis model in multidisciplinary decision making.
    Crane VS; Gilliland M; Tuthill EL; Bruno C
    Hosp Pharm; 1991 Apr; 26(4):309-13, 319-22, 325 passim. PubMed ID: 10110244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.
    Gallego G; Fowler S; van Gool K
    Aust Health Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(3):520-7. PubMed ID: 18666881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decisions about critical events in device-related scenarios as a function of expertise.
    Laxmisan A; Malhotra S; Keselman A; Johnson TR; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):200-12. PubMed ID: 15896693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heuristic evaluation and simulated use testing of infusion pumps to inform pump selection.
    Liu K; Chan FY; Or CK; Sun DT; Lai WS; So HY
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Nov; 131():103932. PubMed ID: 31557700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical support for biomedical equipment decision making.
    Shaffer MD; Shaffer MJ
    Hosp Top; 1995; 73(2):35-41. PubMed ID: 10144625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach.
    Malhotra S; Laxmisan A; Keselman A; Zhang J; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15694884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heuristic evaluation of infusion pumps: implications for patient safety in Intensive Care Units.
    Graham MJ; Kubose TK; Jordan D; Zhang J; Johnson TR; Patel VL
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Nov; 73(11-12):771-9. PubMed ID: 15491928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capturing Essential Information to Achieve Safe Interoperability.
    Weininger S; Jaffe MB; Rausch T; Goldman JM
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jan; 124(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 27387840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
    Matuszewski KA
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technology management: case study of an integrated health system.
    Dahl DH; McFarlan TK
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Dec; 13(17):1-30. PubMed ID: 10139509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Passion for Safety Underpins Healthcare System's Infusion Pump Upgrade.
    Vockley M
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017; 51(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 28103096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.