These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14554135)

  • 1. Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method.
    Tissari S; Rahola J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Nov; 72(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 14554135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG and the Combined MEG/EEG Forward Problem.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Bornfleth H; Oostenveld R; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():30. PubMed ID: 29456487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A precorrected-fFT method to accelerate the solution of the forward problem in magnetoencephalography.
    Tissari S; Rahola J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):523-41. PubMed ID: 12630746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iterative solution of dense linear systems arising from the electrostatic integral equation in MEG.
    Rahol J; Tissari S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(6):961-75. PubMed ID: 11936181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating and Compensating Cerebrospinal Fluid in Surface-Based Forward Models of Magneto- and Electroencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Nummenmaa A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159595. PubMed ID: 27472278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors.
    Nolte G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(22):3637-52. PubMed ID: 14680264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward model theoretical basis for a superconducting imaging surface magnetoencephalography system.
    Maharajh K; Volegov PL; Kraus RH
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 49(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 15005162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG.
    Huang MX; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 10070792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.