415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14555280)
1. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
Crawford RP; Cann CE; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2003 Oct; 33(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 14555280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
Buckley JM; Loo K; Motherway J
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 17174619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.
Dall'Ara E; Pahr D; Varga P; Kainberger F; Zysset P
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21344244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative computed tomography-based predictions of vertebral strength in anterior bending.
Buckley JM; Cheng L; Loo K; Slyfield C; Xu Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1019-27. PubMed ID: 17450078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental testing and biomechanical CT analysis of Chinese cadaveric vertebrae with different modeling approaches.
Wei Y; Feng W; Li G; Li Z; Liu Z; Cheng X; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Jul; 93():8-16. PubMed ID: 34154778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
Zeinali A; Hashemi B; Akhlaghpoor S
Phys Med; 2010 Apr; 26(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 19781969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical testing and biomechanical CT analysis to assess vertebral flexion strength of Chinese cadavers.
Feng W; Wei Y; Song F; Li Z; Fu R; Din RU; Li J; Liu W; Liu Y; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Oct; 108():103882. PubMed ID: 36195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analyses of human vertebral bodies embedded in polymethylmethalcrylate or loaded via the hyperelastic intervertebral disc models provide equivalent predictions of experimental strength.
Lu Y; Maquer G; Museyko O; Püschel K; Engelke K; Zysset P; Morlock M; Huber G
J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2512-6. PubMed ID: 24818795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of 3D QCT scan protocol on the QCT-based finite element models of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):1069-73. PubMed ID: 24894031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.
Imai K; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Yamamoto S; Nakamura K
Osteoporos Int; 2009 May; 20(5):801-10. PubMed ID: 18800178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical versus pre-clinical FE models for vertebral body strength predictions.
Pahr DH; Schwiedrzik J; Dall'Ara E; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 May; 33():76-83. PubMed ID: 23333770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between axial and bending behaviors of the human thoracolumbar vertebra.
Crawford RP; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(20):2248-55. PubMed ID: 15480136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element models of the human lumbar vertebral body: effect of element size on stiffness, damage, and fracture strength predictions.
Crawford RP; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Aug; 125(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 12968567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.
Buckley JM; Kuo CC; Cheng LC; Loo K; Motherway J; Slyfield C; Deviren V; Ames C
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19364678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the vertebral strength using a finite element model derived from low-dose biplanar imaging: benefits of subject-specific material properties.
Sapin-de Brosses E; Jolivet E; Travert C; Mitton D; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E156-62. PubMed ID: 22290213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
