These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14555588)

  • 1. Development of a methacholine challenge method to minimize methacholine waste.
    Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Smycniuk AJ
    Chest; 2003 Oct; 124(4):1522-5. PubMed ID: 14555588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.
    Cockcroft DW; Marciniuk DD; Hurst TS; Cotton DJ; Laframboise KF; McNab BD; Skomro RP
    Chest; 2001 Dec; 120(6):1857-60. PubMed ID: 11742913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods.
    Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Todd DC; Smycniuk AJ
    Chest; 2005 Mar; 127(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 15764765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection.
    Allen ND; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4018-23. PubMed ID: 16354875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma.
    Simard B; Turcotte H; Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Boulay ME; Boulet LP
    Chest; 2005 Jan; 127(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 15653974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods.
    Wubbel C; Asmus MJ; Stevens G; Chesrown SE; Hendeles L
    Chest; 2004 Feb; 125(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 14769724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction.
    Giannini D; Di Franco A; Bacci E; Dente FL; Taccola M; Vagaggini B; Paggiaro P
    Chest; 2000 May; 117(5):1319-23. PubMed ID: 10807817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose versus concentration of methacholine.
    Drotar DE; Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Sep; 83(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 10507268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
    El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.
    Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW; Hannah VD; Davis BE
    Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16381617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.
    Blais CM; Cockcroft DW; Veilleux J; Boulay MÈ; Boulet LP; Gauvreau GM; Scime TX; Watson RM; O'Byrne PM; Davis BE
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2018 Apr; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 28813613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of respiratory inductance plethysmography with thoracoabdominal compression in bronchial challenges in infants and young children.
    Springer C; Godfrey S; Vilozni D; Bar-Yishay E; Noviski N; Avital A
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1996 Sep; 154(3 Pt 1):665-9. PubMed ID: 8810603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) between patients with asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness and mild asthma.
    Yoo Y; Choung JT; Yu J; Kim DK; Choi SH; Koh YY
    Chest; 2007 Jul; 132(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 17505037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1).
    Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2000 Mar; 117(3):881-3. PubMed ID: 10713019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing.
    Nieminen MM; Lahdensuo A; Kellomaeki L; Karvonen J; Muittari A
    Thorax; 1988 Nov; 43(11):896-900. PubMed ID: 3065974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of reducing the fine-particle mass of salmeterol from metered-dose inhalers on bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection against methacholine challenge: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study.
    Langley SJ; Allen D; McDonnell B; Wheeler N; Sharma RK; Sykes A; Woodcock A
    Clin Ther; 2005 Jul; 27(7):1004-12. PubMed ID: 16154479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.