These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14556611)

  • 1. A national technology assessment institute.
    Howell A
    Healthplan; 2003; 44(5):40-5. PubMed ID: 14556611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology assessment: making decisions based on a sound business plan.
    Rowland PJ; Kohn R
    Trustee; 1992 Nov; 45(11):8-9, 25. PubMed ID: 10122315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence and the RCM.
    Palmer L
    RCM Midwives J; 2002 Aug; 5(8):260-1. PubMed ID: 12242758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment in action. Facilities' approaches to technology assessment are related to their size and services.
    Hey M
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):54-7, 86. PubMed ID: 10123571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Economic health technology assessment: challenges and perspectives].
    Zerda A
    Biomedica; 2014; 34(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 24967920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Culyer AJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jul; 1(Pt 3):299-318. PubMed ID: 18634698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Checking out imaging needs before buying equipment.
    Johnson KC; Thrall J
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):54, 56, 58. PubMed ID: 10138446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blues pitches institute. Some question insurer-paid efficacy research.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(20):8-9. PubMed ID: 17546752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Premier unveils venture. Vendor-sponsored institute to push new technologies.
    Hensley S
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Feb; 28(6):14. PubMed ID: 10176650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Something 'nice' can come out of this.
    Weiner JP
    Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 11(1):30, 32. PubMed ID: 11828872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health services technology: Part 2, Policy and managerial considerations.
    Darr K
    Hosp Top; 1998; 76(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 10538910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care technology assessment and adoption: a case study.
    Veluchamy S; Alder HC
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1989 May; 8(13):1-12. PubMed ID: 10304477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health technology assessment in Finland.
    Mäkelä M; Roine RP
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():102-7. PubMed ID: 19500439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bridging the gap between methods research and the needs of policy makers: a review of the research priorities of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Longworth L; Sculpher MJ; Bojke L; Tosh JC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Apr; 27(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21447260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. System execs overcome barriers to tech assessment.
    Souhrada L
    Hospitals; 1989 Aug; 63(15):38-43. PubMed ID: 2753496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.
    Fernandez AM; Schrogie JJ; Wilson WW; Nash DB
    Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(6):240-53. PubMed ID: 9543920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there an alternative to a National Health Board for Technology Assessment?
    Lerner JC
    Med Interface; 1994 Jun; 7(6):123-6, 132. PubMed ID: 10135316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflections on science, judgment, and value in evidence-based decision making: a conversation with David Eddy by Sean R. Tunis.
    Eddy D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):w500-15. PubMed ID: 17580317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.