BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14558210)

  • 1. [Too early to recommend universal screening for colorectal cancer].
    Ekelund G; Janzon L
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Sep; 100(38):2922-6. PubMed ID: 14558210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.
    Lindholm E; Brevinge H; Haglind E
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):1029-36. PubMed ID: 18563785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Arguments against implementing a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer].
    Bonneux L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1777. PubMed ID: 18754310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
    Inadomi JM
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening of colorectal cancer.
    Winawer SJ
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):699-722. PubMed ID: 16226687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Significance of carcinoembryonic antigen in the follow up of colorectal cancer].
    Sanz Rubiales A; García Alvarez G
    Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Feb; 110(7):277-8. PubMed ID: 9562956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial.
    Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Pinsky PF; Bresalier RS; Church T; Yurgalevitch S; Austin JH; Prorok PC; Gohagan JK;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(13):989-97. PubMed ID: 15998952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for colorectal cancer.
    Hakama M; Hoff G; Kronborg O; Påhlman L
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(5):425-39. PubMed ID: 16118076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Screening for colorectal cancer: definitely implement].
    Jansen JB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1776. PubMed ID: 18754309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
    Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Fletcher RH; Stillman JS; O'Brien MJ; Levin B; Smith RA; Lieberman DA; Burt RW; Levin TR; Bond JH; Brooks D; Byers T; Hyman N; Kirk L; Thorson A; Simmang C; Johnson D; Rex DK; ;
    Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1872-85. PubMed ID: 16697750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Time to institute more active follow up after curative surgery for colorectal cancer? Wide variation of follow up and diagnostic routines].
    Smedh K
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Apr; 100(14):1230-2, 1235-6. PubMed ID: 12756651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential impact of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada.
    Flanagan WM; Le Petit C; Berthelot JM; White KJ; Coombs BA; Jones-McLean E
    Chronic Dis Can; 2003; 24(4):81-8. PubMed ID: 14733756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.
    Etzioni DA; Yano EM; Rubenstein LV; Lee ML; Ko CY; Brook RH; Parkerton PH; Asch SM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jul; 49(7):1002-10. PubMed ID: 16673056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods.
    Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: the evidence is in favour but we are still in need of a protocol.
    Papagrigoriadis S
    Int J Surg; 2007 Apr; 5(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 17448977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.
    Ko CW; Sonnenberg A
    Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 16230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Number needed to be screened in a study: a novel measure for disease screening effect].
    Tong F; Chen K; He HQ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 27(8):725-7. PubMed ID: 17172118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.
    Ling BS; Schoen RE; Trauth JM; Wahed AS; Eury T; Simak DM; Solano FX; Weissfeld JL
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Jan; 169(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical practice. Surveillance strategies after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.
    Pfister DG; Benson AB; Somerfield MR
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Jun; 350(23):2375-82. PubMed ID: 15175439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.