BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14558588)

  • 1. Comparison of the effect of orally versus submucosally administered meperidine on the behavior of pediatric dental patients: a retrospective study.
    Song YU; Webb MD
    Anesth Prog; 2003; 50(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 14558588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral midazolam with and without meperidine for management of the difficult young pediatric dental patient: a retrospective study.
    Nathan JE; Vargas KG
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11991315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.
    Primosch RE; Bender F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(4):233-8, 228. PubMed ID: 11862873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.
    Campbell RL; Ross GA; Campbell JR; Mourino AP
    Anesth Prog; 1998; 45(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 10356431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of morphine as compared to meperidine when administered to the moderately anxious pediatric dental patient.
    Roberts SM; Wilson CF; Seale NS; McWhorter AG
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 1303534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient.
    Cathers JW; Wilson CF; Webb MD; Alvarez ME; Schiffman T; Taylor S
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 16435640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the efficacy of oral midazolam alone versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric dental patient.
    Musial KM; Wilson S; Preisch J; Weaver J
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 14649610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of midazolam to meperidine/promethazine as an IM sedative technique for the pediatric dental patient.
    Downs AT; Dembo J; Ferretti G; Lyons TD; Pelphery A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):197-200, 165, 228. PubMed ID: 9262801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Chowdhury J; Vargas KG
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16173222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral ketamine for pediatric outpatient dental surgery sedation.
    Alfonzo-Echeverri EC; Berg JH; Wild TW; Glass NL
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 8378155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Project USAP--Part III: Practice by heavy users of sedation in pediatric dentistry.
    Houpt MI
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 8340520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Retrospective Study of 248 Pediatric Oral Sedations Utilizing the Combination of Meperidine and Hydroxyzine for Dental Treatment.
    Lenahan M; Wells M; Scarbecz M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.
    Dallman JA; Ignelzi MA; Briskie DM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 11699169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison study between ketamine and ketamine-promethazine combination for oral sedation in pediatric dental patients.
    Bui T; Redden RJ; Murphy S
    Anesth Prog; 2002; 49(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12779109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect on behavior of dental treatment rendered under conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients.
    Fuhrer CT; Weddell JA; Sanders BJ; Jones JE; Dean JA; Tomlin A
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 20108740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation.
    Myers GR; Maestrello CL; Mourino AP; Best AM
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15080356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student elective report. Paediatric sedation in the USA.
    Easton J; Lamb K
    SAAD Dig; 2000 Apr; 17(2):3-12. PubMed ID: 11404926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of the success of meperidine and promethazine sedation in medically compromised children.
    Haney KL; McWhorter AG; Seale NS
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):288-94. PubMed ID: 8258571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral assessments of two drug combinations for oral sedation.
    Sams DR; Cook EW; Jackson JG; Roebuck BL
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 8378156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral midazolam versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric patient.
    Wilson S
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):4. PubMed ID: 15080350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.