These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14559039)

  • 1. Fetal development after assisted reproduction--a review.
    Cetin I; Cozzi V; Antonazzo P
    Placenta; 2003 Oct; 24 Suppl B():S104-13. PubMed ID: 14559039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do assisted-reproduction twin pregnancies require additional antenatal care?
    Jauniaux E; Ben-Ami I; Maymon R
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 23273753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Assisted reproduction technologies and the risk of fetal, chromosomal and genetic malformations].
    Imbar T; Tsafrir A; Lev-Sagie A; Hurwitz A; Laufer N; Holzer H
    Harefuah; 2006 Mar; 145(3):223-8, 243-4. PubMed ID: 16599322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproduction causes placental maldevelopment and dysfunction linked to reduced fetal weight in mice.
    Chen S; Sun FZ; Huang X; Wang X; Tang N; Zhu B; Li B
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():10596. PubMed ID: 26085229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gametes and embryo epigenetic reprogramming affect developmental outcome: implication for assisted reproductive technologies.
    Jacob S; Moley KH
    Pediatr Res; 2005 Sep; 58(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 16148054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology, epigenetics, and long-term health: a developmental time bomb still ticking.
    Grace KS; Sinclair KD
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Sep; 27(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 19711251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology.
    Lucifero D; Chaillet JR; Trasler JM
    Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 15005460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of epigenetics and genomic imprinting in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Laprise SL
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2009 Nov; 76(11):1006-18. PubMed ID: 19484754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of genomic imprinting and gestational-age dynamic methylation in complicated pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technologies.
    Camprubí C; Iglesias-Platas I; Martin-Trujillo A; Salvador-Alarcon C; Rodriguez MA; Barredo DR; Court F; Monk D
    Biol Reprod; 2013 Sep; 89(3):50. PubMed ID: 23884645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contribution of animal models to the study of reproduction, assisted reproductive technologies and of development].
    Jammes H; Fauque P; Jouannet P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2010 Feb; 194(2):301-17; discussion 317-8. PubMed ID: 21166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on the genome and epigenome of the newborn.
    Kochanski A; Merritt TA; Gadzinowski J; Jopek A
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2013; 6(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24246511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epigenetic Influences During the Periconception Period and Assisted Reproduction.
    Amoako AA; Nafee TM; Ola B
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 1014():15-39. PubMed ID: 28864983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of assisted reproductive techniques on the embryonic epigenome in cattle.
    Rivera RM
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2019 Jan; 32(2):65-81. PubMed ID: 32188559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in ectopic pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technologies in the UK: a 12-year nationwide analysis including 160 000 pregnancies.
    Santos-Ribeiro S; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 26724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epigenetics and assisted reproduction.
    Wilkins-Haug L
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19458521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
    Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spontaneous loss of a co-twin and the risk of birth defects after assisted conception.
    Davies MJ; Rumbold AR; Whitrow MJ; Willson KJ; Scheil WK; Mol BW; Moore VM
    J Dev Orig Health Dis; 2016 Dec; 7(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 27374401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the probability of prenatal diagnosis or termination of pregnancy different for fetuses with congenital anomalies conceived following assisted reproductive techniques? A population-based evaluation of fetuses with congenital heart defects.
    Tararbit K; Lelong N; Jouannic JM; Goffinet F; Khoshnood B;
    BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):924-31. PubMed ID: 25752912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: implications for human assisted reproduction.
    El Hajj N; Haaf T
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(3):632-41. PubMed ID: 23357453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.