These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14559410)

  • 1. Development of non-keyboard input device checklists through assessments.
    Woods V; Hastings S; Buckle P; Haslam R
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 14559410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices.
    Weiss DL; Siddiqui KM; Scopelliti J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Apr; 3(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 17412058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of four cursor control devices during a target acquisition task for laparoscopic tool control.
    Herring SR; Trejo AE; Hallbeck MS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 19426963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard.
    McLoone HE; Jacobson M; Clark P; Opina R; Hegg C; Johnson P
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1529-39. PubMed ID: 19941185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical exposure differences between children and adults when using standard and small computer input devices.
    Blackstone JM; Karr C; Camp J; Johnson PW
    Ergonomics; 2008 Jun; 51(6):872-89. PubMed ID: 18484401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device.
    Lee YH; Su MC
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 18022139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy.
    Pousada T; Pareira J; Groba B; Nieto L; Pazos A
    Assist Technol; 2014; 26(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 24800452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a vertical keyboard design on typing performance, user comfort and muscle tension.
    van Galen GP; Liesker H; de Haan A
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16516844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of input device and motion type on a cursor-positioning task.
    Yau YJ; Hwang SL; Chao CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 18459358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use.
    Lee DL; McLoone H; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17400173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of functional parameters and comfort of a new computer mouse as compared with other types of input devices.
    Dehghan N; Choobineh A; Razeghi M; Hasanzadeh J; Irandoost M; Ebrahimi S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 26694001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A five-layer users' need hierarchy of computer input device selection: a contextual observation survey of computer users with cervical spinal injuries (CSI).
    Tsai TH; Nash RJ; Tseng KC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 May; 4(3):158-80. PubMed ID: 19378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of alternative computer input devices used by people with disabilities.
    Turpin G; Armstrong J; Frost P; Fine B; Ward C; Pinnington L
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):119-29. PubMed ID: 16019881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiment on a novel user input for computer interface utilizing tongue input for the severely disabled.
    Kencana AP; Heng J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Nov; 3(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19117196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools.
    Kuijt-Evers LF; Groenesteijn L; de Looze MP; Vink P
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Sep; 35(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 15246883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new input device: comparison to three commercially available mouses.
    Brown JN; Albert WJ; Croll J
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):208-27. PubMed ID: 17419155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Vocal Joystick: evaluation of voice-based cursor control techniques for assistive technology.
    Harada S; Landay JA; Malkin J; Li X; Bilmes JA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jan; 3(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18416516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enabling devices, empowering people: the design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite.
    Wobbrock JO; Myers BA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jan; 3(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 18416517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of the performance of novel chorded keyboards in combination with pointing input devices.
    Shi WZ; Wu FG
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():1-7. PubMed ID: 25064640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic evaluation of current control devices used by people with intellectual disabilities in non-immersive virtual environments.
    Standen PJ; Brown DJ; Anderton N; Battersby S
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Oct; 9(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 17034329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.