These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14559424)

  • 1. Minimal acceptable handling time intervals for lifting and lowering tasks.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 14559424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18432440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating of acceptable load in manual sorting of postal parcels.
    Stålhammar HR; Louhevaara V; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1996 Oct; 39(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 8876080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 1. maximum acceptable weight measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan; 39(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 8851077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual handling performance: the effects of menstrual cycle phase.
    Birch KM; Reilly T
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1317-32. PubMed ID: 10582502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working height, block mass and one- vs. two-handed block handling: the contribution to low back and shoulder loading during masonry work.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Kuijer PP; van der Molen HF; Hoozemans MJ; Frings-Dresen MH; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2009 Sep; 52(9):1104-18. PubMed ID: 19787512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.
    Schibye B; Hansen AF; Hye-Knudsen CT; Essendrop M; Böcher M; Skotte J
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Mar; 34(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 12628568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the minimum sampling rate needed to accurately quantify cumulative spine loading from digitized video.
    Andrews DM; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 14559419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
    Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychophysical criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jan; 41(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 9468807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.