443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14560188)
1. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of results of total disc replacement in postdiscectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery.
Leahy M; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Rashbaum RF; Sachs BL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):1690-3; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 18580740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
Zigler JE
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement.
Yaszay B; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Quirno M; Spivak JM; Errico TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):508-12; discussion 513. PubMed ID: 18317194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
Dewing CB; Provencher MT; Riffenburgh RH; Kerr S; Manos RE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The mid- or long-term clinical results of prosthetic disc nucleus replacement in the treatment of lumbar disc disease].
Ma YZ; Xue HB; Chen X; Guo LX; Li HW; Liu HR
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 18785530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
