143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14560190)
21. Porous coated motion cervical disc replacement: a biomechanical, histomorphometric, and biologic wear analysis in a caprine model.
Hu N; Cunningham BW; McAfee PC; Kim SW; Sefter JC; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1666-73. PubMed ID: 16816760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gravimetric wear analysis and particulate characterization of bilateral facet-augmentation system--PercuDyn™.
Bhattacharya S; Nayak A; Goel VK; Warren C; Schlaegle S; Ferrara L
Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 21263179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the biological response of wear debris.
Chang BS; Brown PR; Sieber A; Valdevit A; Tateno K; Kostuik JP
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):239S-244S. PubMed ID: 15541672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation.
Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 18404108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Contrastive analysis of neck axial symptoms after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty or traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].
Cao J; Shen Y; Yang D; Ding W; Meng X; Zhang W; Li Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(10):1200-4. PubMed ID: 18979878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study].
Wang Y; Cai B; Zhang XS; Xiao SH; Wang Z; Lu N; Chai W; Zheng GQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18785525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty.
Grupp TM; Meisel HJ; Cotton JA; Schwiesau J; Fritz B; Blömer W; Jansson V
Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 19815271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Models that incorporate spinal structures predict better wear performance of cervical artificial discs.
Bhattacharya S; Goel VK; Liu X; Kiapour A; Serhan HA
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):766-76. PubMed ID: 21802999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Bryan cervical disc system.
Papadopoulos S
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):629-36, vi. PubMed ID: 16326286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Prestige cervical disc replacement.
Traynelis VC
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):310S-314S. PubMed ID: 15541682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review.
Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Brayda-Bruno M; Fornari M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1095-104. PubMed ID: 18635294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.
Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis--does it occur?
Sears WR; Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Williamson OD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17285044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement.
Yi S; Kim KN; Yang MS; Yang JW; Kim H; Ha Y; Yoon DH; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(16):1556-61. PubMed ID: 20581764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implant failure of Bryan cervical disc due to broken polyurethane sheath: a case report.
Fan H; Wu S; Wu Z; Wang Z; Guo Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E814-6. PubMed ID: 22210017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro wear assessment of the Charité Artificial Disc according to ASTM recommendations.
Serhan HA; Dooris AP; Parsons ML; Ares PJ; Gabriel SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1900-10. PubMed ID: 16924206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.
Stratton-Powell AA; Pasko KM; Brockett CL; Tipper JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2394-2404. PubMed ID: 27432420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
