115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1456020)
1. Calculation of 3-D deformity in scoliosis by standard roentgenograms.
Schmidt J; Gassel F; Naughton S
Acta Orthop Belg; 1992; 58 Suppl 1():60-5. PubMed ID: 1456020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Calculation of 3-D deformity in scoliosis by MRI of the total spine in two perpendicular reconstructed planes].
Gassel F; Schmitz A; Koenig R; Jaeger U; Heinemann C; Schmitt O
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12029588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical use of the simple 3D-calculation in scoliosis.
Schmidt J; Gassel F
Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Jan; 23(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study.
Ovadia D; Bar-On E; Fragnière B; Rigo M; Dickman D; Leitner J; Wientroub S; Dubousset J
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jan; 16(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16705434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A mathematical expression of three-dimensional configuration of the scoliotic spine.
Kanayama M; Tadano S; Kaneda K; Ukai T; Abumi K
J Biomech Eng; 1996 May; 118(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8738791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis.
Goldberg CJ; Kaliszer M; Moore DP; Fogarty EE; Dowling FE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(4):E55-63. PubMed ID: 11224901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Bigalow LC; Moreland MS
J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 3819902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Cobb angles measured manually, calculated from 3-D spinal reconstruction, and estimated from torso asymmetry.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Aug; 5(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 12186706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface topography and the several components of scoliotic deformity.
Goldberg CJ; Moore DP; Fogarty EE; Dowling FE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():67-9. PubMed ID: 15456004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the gait pathology in scoliotic patients depend on the severity of spine deformity? Preliminary results.
Syczewska M; Graff K; Kalinowska M; Szczerbik E; Domaniecki J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2010; 12(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 20653321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. End vertebra angle--a roentgenographic method to describe a scoliosis. A follow-up study of idiopathic scoliosis treated with the Boston brace.
Appelgren G; Willner S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Feb; 15(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 2326714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sagittal configuration of the spine and growth of the posterior elements in early scoliosis.
Xiong B; Sevastik J; Hedlund R; Sevastik B
J Orthop Res; 1994 Jan; 12(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 8113933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Armstrong JG; Moreland MS
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 3334733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [3-dimensional approach to spinal deformities. Application to the study of the prognosis of pediatric scoliosis].
Graf H; Hecquet J; Dubousset J
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1983; 69(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 6227944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs.
DeSmet AA; Goin JE; Asher MA; Scheuch HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1982 Apr; 64(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 7068691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical Effects of Unilateral Mastectomy on Spine Deformity.
Serel S; Tuzlalı ZY; Akkaya Z; Uzun Ç; Kaya B; Bayar S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 27876481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review.
Moftian N; Hachesu PR; Pourfeizi HH; Samad-Soltani T; Aghazadeh N; Poureisa M; Salahzadeh Z
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(10):922-932. PubMed ID: 32008520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonstandard vertebral rotation in scoliosis screening patients. Its prevalence and relation to the clinical deformity.
Armstrong GW; Livermore NB; Suzuki N; Armstrong JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1982; 7(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 7071661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms.
Beekman CE; Hall V
Phys Ther; 1979 Jun; 59(6):764-5. PubMed ID: 441122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the change in three dimensional deformity for idiopathic scoliosis using axially loaded MRI.
Little JP; Izatt MT; Labrom RD; Askin GN; Adam CJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jun; 27(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 22226470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
