142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14560455)
21. Rethinking the Patient Self Determination Act: implementation without effectiveness.
Collins SE
J Nurs Law; 1999 Nov; 6(3):29-46. PubMed ID: 16285128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Tracking nursing home patients with dementia with a microchip: need for consent debated].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2008 May; 61(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 18552118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Consent to act.
Picton C
Emerg Nurse; 2007 Oct; 15(6):1. PubMed ID: 18019293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Informed consent in the elderly].
Leliévre N
Soins Gerontol; 2004; (47):26-30. PubMed ID: 15211855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Exploring the gray areas of informed consent.
Dunn D
Nurs Manage; 2000 Jul; 31(7):20-5; quiz 25-6. PubMed ID: 15127502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Ethical and legal questions in psychiatric nursing].
Torralba Madrid MJ; López Martínez D
Rev Enferm; 1999 May; 22(5):362-3. PubMed ID: 10514768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Treating mentally incapacitated adults.
Health Care Anal; 1994 Feb; 2(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10134375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Silence does not mean acceptance.
Faulkner M
Nurs Times; 1999 May 12-18; 95(19):43. PubMed ID: 10437491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Implications of consent for medical practice.
Nicholas S; Stephens R
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2017 Jun; 78(6):C92-C95. PubMed ID: 28614032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of Force for Medical Purposes--A Danish Perspective.
Adolphsen C; Naur E
Eur J Health Law; 2015 Sep; 22(4):359-81. PubMed ID: 26427273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Autonomy and clinical practice. 3: Issues of patient consent.
McParland J; Scott PA; Arndt M; Dassen T; Gasull M; Lemonidou C; Valimaki M; Leino-Kilpi H
Br J Nurs; 2000 May 25-Jun 7; 9(10):660-5. PubMed ID: 11235277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consent and the law: problems facing nurses.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2001 Mar 8-21; 10(5):282. PubMed ID: 12170668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. On adolescence and informed consent.
Plaus FX; Brissenden RB
Health Law Can; 1994; 14(3):68-73. PubMed ID: 10133698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective.
Francis R
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent and risk communication in France.
Moumjid N; Callu MF
BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):734-5. PubMed ID: 14512485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal aspects of consent 10: determining "best interests".
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2001 Jul 26-Aug 8; 10(14):916-7. PubMed ID: 11927896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].
Dreyer J
Psychiatr Prax; 2006 Sep; 33(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 16944443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Can adults with cognitive impairment consent to take part in research?
Donnelly J
J Wound Care; 2004 Jul; 13(7):257-62. PubMed ID: 15977765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The delivery dilemma: a question of competency.
Cushing M
Am J Nurs; 1993 Apr; 93(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 8480798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
