These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14560530)
1. The Bethesda System 2001: an update of new terminology for gynecologic cytology. Henry MR Clin Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 23(3):585-603. PubMed ID: 14560530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The Bethesda system: new revision of the terminology from 2001 year]. Kostova P; Zlatkov V Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(4):52-5. PubMed ID: 15318545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1. Clary KM; Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Austin RM; Thomas N; Chmara BA; Sugrue C; Tworek J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire. Crothers BA; Darragh TM; Tambouret RH; Nayar R; Barkan GA; Zhao C; Booth CN; Padmanabhan V; Tabatabai ZL; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Wilbur DC; Moriarty AT Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: A Historical Perspective. Nayar R; Wilbur DC Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):359-372. PubMed ID: 28693017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Specimen adequacy evaluation in gynecologic cytopathology: current laboratory practice in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program and tentative guidelines for future practice. Nielsen ML; Davey DD; Kline TS Diagn Cytopathol; 1993 Aug; 9(4):394-403. PubMed ID: 8261844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Education and training for cytopathologists. Its role in quality assurance. Parker JE Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):448-50. PubMed ID: 2750433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of proficiency testing in ensuring quality: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3. Howell LP; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Tworek J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23368860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3. Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology. Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Terminology and specimen adequacy in cervicovaginal cytology. The College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program experience. Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Rosenstock W; Kline TS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Sep; 116(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 1524452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. Solomon D; Davey D; Kurman R; Moriarty A; O'Connor D; Prey M; Raab S; Sherman M; Wilbur D; Wright T; Young N; ; JAMA; 2002 Apr; 287(16):2114-9. PubMed ID: 11966386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving consistency in cervical cytology reporting. Mitchell H J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(19):1592-6. PubMed ID: 8411232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment. Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response. MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Progress report on the Bethesda System]. Cochand-Priollet B; Ziol M; ; Cartier I; Dubois A; Michiels-Marzais D; Müller J; Picot R; Tartar MD; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vincent S Ann Pathol; 2006 Oct; 26(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 17255927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference on good laboratory practices in gynecologic cytology: background, rationale, and organization. Tworek JA; Henry MR; Blond B; Jones BA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 23368857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of the Bethesda System to Mainland China with a Web-based tutorial. Yuan Q; Chang AR; Ng HK Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 12789924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Terminology of the BSCC, European Community and the Bethesda system: the boundary between low-grade and high-grade cytology. Herbert A; Gray W; Cross P Cytopathology; 2009 Feb; 20(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 19133066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]