209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14560826)
21. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
Martin JS; Marsh JL; Bonar SK; DeCoster TA; Found EM; Brandser EA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 9334948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The value of CT compared to radiographs in the classification and treatment plan of trochanteric fractures.
van Embden D; Scheurkogel MM; Schipper IB; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1091-7. PubMed ID: 27365082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.
Wood KB; Khanna G; Vaccaro AR; Arnold PM; Harris MB; Mehbod AA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1423-9. PubMed ID: 15995107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures.
te Stroet MA; Holla M; Biert J; van Kampen A
Emerg Radiol; 2011 Aug; 18(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 21394519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Greater Tuberosity Fractures: Does Fracture Assessment and Treatment Recommendation Vary Based on Imaging Modality?
Janssen SJ; Hermanussen HH; Guitton TG; van den Bekerom MP; van Deurzen DF; Ring D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1257-65. PubMed ID: 26797912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A New Classification System for Pilon Fractures Based on CT Scan: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation.
Palma J; Villa A; Mery P; Abarca M; Mora A; Peña A; Urrutia J; Filippi J
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar; 28(5):208-213. PubMed ID: 31800439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of computerized tomography on classification and treatment plan for patellar fractures.
Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Pardee NC; Gardner MJ; Toro JB; Macintyre NR; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):336-44. PubMed ID: 22955333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability assessment of calcaneal fracture classification systems.
Howells NR; Hughes AW; Jackson M; Atkins RM; Livingstone JA
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23993039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Role of Computed Tomography in Evaluating Intra-Articular Distal Humerus Fractures.
Nolan BM; Sweet SJ; Ferkel E; Udofia AA; Itamura J
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Sep; 44(9):E326-30. PubMed ID: 26372759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective study of the reproducibility of X-rays and CT scans for assessing trochanteric fracture comminution in the elderly: a series of 110 cases.
Isida R; Bariatinsky V; Kern G; Dereudre G; Demondion X; Chantelot C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1165-70. PubMed ID: 26141046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interobserver and intraobserver variations in tibial pilon fracture classification systems.
Ramappa M; Bajwa A; Singh A; Mackenney P; Hui A; Port A
Foot (Edinb); 2010; 20(2-3):61-3. PubMed ID: 20609577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gotfried percutaneous compression plating compared with sliding hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a prospective randomized study.
Yang E; Qureshi S; Trokhan S; Joseph D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93(10):942-7. PubMed ID: 21593370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interobserver reliability of coronoid fracture classification: two-dimensional versus three-dimensional computed tomography.
Lindenhovius A; Karanicolas PJ; Bhandari M; van Dijk N; Ring D;
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 34(9):1640-6. PubMed ID: 19833449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
