199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14561262)
1. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer.
Cole SR; Young GP; Esterman A; Cadd B; Morcom J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 14561262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prescreening evaluation of a brush-based faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin.
Young GP; St John DJ; Cole SR; Bielecki BE; Pizzey C; Sinatra MA; Polglase AL; Cadd B; Morcom J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 14561263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Smith A; Young GP; Cole SR; Bampton P
Cancer; 2006 Nov; 107(9):2152-9. PubMed ID: 16998938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sensitive guaiac faecal occult blood test is less useful than an immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening in a Chinese population.
Wong BC; Wong WM; Cheung KL; Tong TS; Rozen P; Young GP; Chu KW; Ho J; Law WL; Tung HM; Lai KC; Hu WH; Chan CK; Lam SK
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2003 Nov; 18(9):941-6. PubMed ID: 14616158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance characteristics and comparison of two immunochemical and two guaiac fecal occult blood screening tests for colorectal neoplasia.
Rozen P; Knaani J; Samuel Z
Dig Dis Sci; 1997 Oct; 42(10):2064-71. PubMed ID: 9365136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of dietary restriction on participation in faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer.
Cole SR; Young GP
Med J Aust; 2001 Aug; 175(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 11587278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT).
Hoff G; Grotmol T; Thiis-Evensen E; Bretthauer M; Gondal G; Vatn MH
Gut; 2004 Sep; 53(9):1329-33. PubMed ID: 15306594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia in kidney transplant recipients: cross sectional prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study of faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin and colonoscopy.
Collins MG; Teo E; Cole SR; Chan CY; McDonald SP; Russ GR; Young GP; Bampton PA; Coates PT
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4657. PubMed ID: 22833618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.
Cole SR; Young GP; Byrne D; Guy JR; Morcom J
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 12518003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screening.
van Roon AH; Goede SL; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; Looman CW; Biermann K; Reijerink JC; Mannetje H'; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2013 Mar; 62(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 22387523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.
Brenner H; Tao S
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 49(14):3049-54. PubMed ID: 23706981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A double immunochemical method for detecting faecal haemoglobin and albumin in rectal screening].
Tarpay A; Szabadosné Németh M; Orosz E; Kásler M; Burai M; Pap A; Ottó S
Magy Onkol; 2011 Nov; 55(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 22128309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district.
Grazzini G; Ventura L; Zappa M; Ciatto S; Confortini M; Rapi S; Rubeca T; Visioli CB; Halloran SP
Gut; 2010 Nov; 59(11):1511-5. PubMed ID: 20603498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting faecal immunochemical test positive rates: demographic, pathological, behavioural and environmental variables.
Symonds EL; Osborne JM; Cole SR; Bampton PA; Fraser RJ; Young GP
J Med Screen; 2015 Dec; 22(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 25977374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of sample storage temperature and buffer formulation on faecal immunochemical test haemoglobin measurements.
Symonds EL; Cole SR; Bastin D; Fraser RJ; Young GP
J Med Screen; 2017 Dec; 24(4):176-181. PubMed ID: 28073307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The immunochemical faecal occult blood test leads to higher compliance than the guaiac for colorectal cancer screening programmes: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Federici A; Giorgi Rossi P; Borgia P; Bartolozzi F; Farchi S; Gausticchi G
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15949119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for colorectal cancer. A comparison of 3 fecal occult blood tests.
Levin B; Hess K; Johnson C
Arch Intern Med; 1997 May; 157(9):970-6. PubMed ID: 9140267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
