These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14561415)

  • 1. Speaking volumes.
    Williams N
    Curr Biol; 2003 Oct; 13(20):R789-90. PubMed ID: 14561415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendel and Darwin.
    Berry A; Browne J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(30):e2122144119. PubMed ID: 35858395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What would have happened if Darwin had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?
    Lorenzano P
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2011; 33(1):3-49. PubMed ID: 21789954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limits of imagination: the 150th Anniversary of Mendel's Laws, and why Mendel failed to see the importance of his discovery for Darwin's theory of evolution.
    Singh RS
    Genome; 2015 Sep; 58(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 26372894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of de Vries in the rediscovery of Mendel's paper. II. Did de Vries really understand Mendel's paper?
    Corcos AF; Monaghan FV
    J Hered; 1987; 78(4):275-6. PubMed ID: 3305693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mendel and Darwin: untangling a persistent enigma.
    Fairbanks DJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Feb; 124(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 31848463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Darwin's Influence on Mendel: Evidence from a New Translation of Mendel's Paper.
    Fairbanks DJ; Abbott S
    Genetics; 2016 Oct; 204(2):401-405. PubMed ID: 27729491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Full Breadth of Mendel's Genetics.
    van Dijk PJ; Ellis TH
    Genetics; 2016 Dec; 204(4):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27927898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Mendel's Interest in Inheritance Grew out of Plant Improvement.
    van Dijk PJ; Weissing FJ; Ellis THN
    Genetics; 2018 Oct; 210(2):347-355. PubMed ID: 30287513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The curious case of blending inheritance.
    Porter TM
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():125-32. PubMed ID: 24803228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Darwin and Mendel today: a comment on "Limits of imagination: the 150th Anniversary of Mendel's Laws, and why Mendel failed to see the importance of his discovery for Darwin's theory of evolution".
    Liu Y; Li X
    Genome; 2016 Jan; 59(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 26651239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendel, the empiricist.
    Monaghan FV; Corcos AF
    J Hered; 1985; 76(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3884699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mendelism: New Insights from Gregor Mendel's Lectures in Brno.
    Zhang H; Chen W; Sun K
    Genetics; 2017 Sep; 207(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28874451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Charles Darwin and other great men in correspondence with Carl Wilhelm von Naegeli.
    Naegeli W; Wiedemann HR
    Am J Med Genet; 1993 Apr; 46(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 8484417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reexamination of the fate of Mendel's paper.
    Monaghan FV; Corcos AF
    J Hered; 1987; 78(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 3295022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A conceptual ambiguity that contributed to the neglect of Mendel's paper.
    Sandler I; Sandler L
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 1985; 7(1):3-70. PubMed ID: 3895281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Charles Darwin's reputation: how it changed during the twentieth-century and how it may change again.
    Amundson R
    Endeavour; 2014; 38(3-4):257-67. PubMed ID: 25455542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendel's theory: its context and plausibility.
    Campbell M
    Centaurus; 1982; 26(1):38-69. PubMed ID: 6758957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of de Vries in the recovery of Mendel's work. I. Was de Vries really an independent discoverer of Mendel?
    Corcos A; Monaghan F
    J Hered; 1985; 76(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3889132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The emergence of genetics from Festetics' sheep through Mendel's peas to Bateson's chickens.
    Szabó AT; Poczai P
    J Genet; 2019 Jun; 98(2):. PubMed ID: 31204695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.