These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14561450)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):621-35. PubMed ID: 14561450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 12590846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambiguous function words do not prevent 18-month-olds from building accurate syntactic category expectations: An ERP study.
    Brusini P; Dehaene-Lambertz G; van Heugten M; de Carvalho A; Goffinet F; Fiévet AC; Christophe A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():4-12. PubMed ID: 27544044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hopf JM; Bader M; Meng M; Bayer J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 12429368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.
    Erdocia K; Laka I; Mestres-Missé A; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Apr; 109(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19223065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing inflectional morphology: ERP evidence for decomposition of complex words according to the affix structure.
    Regel S; Opitz A; Müller G; Friederici AD
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():143-153. PubMed ID: 30466728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
    Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.
    Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(11):1531-49. PubMed ID: 10906378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory language comprehension in children with developmental dyslexia: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Sabisch B; Hahne A; Glass E; von Suchodoletz W; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1676-95. PubMed ID: 17014373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP evidence for on-line syntactic computations in 2-year-olds.
    Brusini P; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Dutat M; Goffinet F; Christophe A
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 19():164-73. PubMed ID: 27038839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging and resolution of quantifier scope effects.
    Kemtes KA; Kemper S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 1999 Nov; 54(6):P350-60. PubMed ID: 10625963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating predictability, plausibility and possibility of sentence continuations in reading: evidence from late-positivity ERPs.
    Quante L; Bölte J; Zwitserlood P
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5717. PubMed ID: 30345170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and syntactic processes during sentence comprehension in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ruchsow M; Trippel N; Groen G; Spitzer M; Kiefer M
    Schizophr Res; 2003 Nov; 64(2-3):147-56. PubMed ID: 14613679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension.
    Hahne A; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroreport; 2002 Mar; 13(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 11930128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context.
    Federmeier KD; Segal JB; Lombrozo T; Kutas M
    Brain; 2000 Dec; 123 Pt 12():2552-66. PubMed ID: 11099456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automaticity of higher cognitive functions: neurophysiological evidence for unconscious syntactic processing of masked words.
    Jiménez-Ortega L; García-Milla M; Fondevila S; Casado P; Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Martín-Loeches M
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 103():83-91. PubMed ID: 25161085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.