These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14561454)

  • 1. The Tower of London: the impact of instructions, cueing, and learning on planning abilities.
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Leonhart R; Ruff CC; Halsband U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):675-83. PubMed ID: 14561454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental planning and the Tower of London task.
    Phillips LH; Wynn VE; McPherson S; Gilhooly KJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):579-97. PubMed ID: 11394063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is in a name: comparing the Tower of London with one of its variants.
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U; Kaller CP
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):418-28. PubMed ID: 15820648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task.
    Berg WK; Byrd DL; McNamara JP; Case K
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 20167413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function?
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Quiske K; Hoppe-Seyler K; Meier C; Müller C; Halsband U
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):846-56. PubMed ID: 15370380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task.
    Beauchamp MH; Dagher A; Aston JA; Doyon J
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1649-60. PubMed ID: 14642475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a neuropsychological activation probe with SPECT: the 'Tower of London' task in healthy volunteers.
    Goethals I; Audenaert K; Jacobs F; Van de Wiele C; Pyck H; Ham H; Vandierendonck A; van Heeringen C; Dierckx R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Feb; 25(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 15154709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning.
    Newman SD; Pittman G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Apr; 29(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of planning ability: Psychometric analyses on the unidimensionality and construct validity of the Tower of London Task (TOL-F).
    Debelak R; Egle J; Köstering L; Kaller CP
    Neuropsychology; 2016 Mar; 30(3):346-360. PubMed ID: 26523519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation.
    Abernethy B; Schorer J; Jackson RC; Hagemann N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 22564086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the Tower of London task (TOL-F).
    Köstering L; Schmidt CS; Egger K; Amtage F; Peter J; Klöppel S; Beume LA; Hoeren M; Weiller C; Kaller CP
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():646-55. PubMed ID: 26197091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue familiarity is represented in monkey medial prefrontal cortex during visuomotor association learning.
    Inase M; Li BM; Takashima I; Iijima T
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):281-6. PubMed ID: 16307235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does attentional cueing affect dichotic listening performance in children?
    Obrzut JE; Boliek CA; Asbjornsen A
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 17083293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task.
    Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 15268923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of memory in the Tower of London task.
    Phillips LH; Wynn V; Gilhooly KJ; Della Sala S; Logie RH
    Memory; 1999 Mar; 7(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 10645380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliability of the Tower of London Planning Task (TOL-F).
    Köstering L; Nitschke K; Schumacher FK; Weiller C; Kaller CP
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Sep; 27(3):925-31. PubMed ID: 25822835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence in the performance of the Tower of London task.
    D'Antuono G; La Torre FR; Marin D; Antonucci G; Piccardi L; Guariglia C
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2017; 24(6):548-558. PubMed ID: 27645626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of healthy, older adults on the Tower of London Revised: Associations with verbal and nonverbal abilities.
    Zook N; Welsh MC; Ewing V
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 16766340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.