258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562071)
1. Time to choose.
Aldhous P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):655. PubMed ID: 14562071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Damned if they do, damned if they don't..
Giles J
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):656-7. PubMed ID: 14562072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who is driving biotechnology acceptance?
Kalaitzandonakes N; Bijman J
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 12665818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A little protectionism goes a long way.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):99. PubMed ID: 12634739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
Hails RS
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A fruitless campaign.
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7221):421-2. PubMed ID: 19037266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Putting Cartagena into practice.
Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Out of bounds.
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):132-3. PubMed ID: 17215811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products.
Kapuscinski AR; Goodman RM; Hann SD; Jacobs LR; Pullins EE; Johnson CS; Kinsey JD; Krall RL; La Viña AG; Mellon MG; Ruttan VW
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):599-601. PubMed ID: 12776139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):468-9. PubMed ID: 12721556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant biotechnology: Tarnished promise.
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7447):21. PubMed ID: 23636376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptance of golden rice in the Philippine 'rice bowl'.
Chong M
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):971-2. PubMed ID: 12949549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US calls for early data on transgenic crop safety.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):571. PubMed ID: 12167819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions.
Barton J; Crandon J; Kennedy D; Miller H
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Sep; 15(9):845-8. PubMed ID: 9306396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tougher rules aim to prevent gene flow into crops.
Hoag H
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):103. PubMed ID: 12634744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Activists should accept mainstream view of GM.
Dennis DT
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7042):561. PubMed ID: 15931192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transgenic aubergines put on ice.
Jayaraman KS
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7267):1041. PubMed ID: 19847236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fears over Europe's GM crop plan.
Chipman A
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):542-3. PubMed ID: 20671684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Divisions sink US consensus effort on transgenic food.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
