230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562076)
21. Making an impact.
Wu R
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
Pendlebury DA
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A possible way out of the impact-factor game.
Tse H
Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7207):938-9. PubMed ID: 18719564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service.
Butler D
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research.
Jiménez-Contreras E; Delgado López-Cózar E; Ruiz-Pérez R; Fernández VM
Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):898. PubMed ID: 12087380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Q&A: The global view.
Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact factors: just part of a research treadmill.
de Meis L; do Carmo MS; de Meis C
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6950):723. PubMed ID: 12917657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Not-so-deep impact.
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15973362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
Gibson TA
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Thoughtful peer review is worth the time it takes.
Michalet X
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7046):1160. PubMed ID: 15988495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
Clausen T; Nielsen OB
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. No researcher is too junior to fix science.
Tregoning J
Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):7. PubMed ID: 28470218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pushing for power.
Lagendijk A
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7067):429. PubMed ID: 16306972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The real value of the impact factors].
Puche RC
Medicina (B Aires); 2003; 63(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 14518150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
