230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562076)
41. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
Korngreen A
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Science in the web age: joint efforts.
Butler D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):548-9. PubMed ID: 16319855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Peer review could be improved by market forces.
Jaffe K
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The joy of discovery.
de Duve C
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The secrets of success.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review.
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nature; 1997 May; 387(6631):341-3. PubMed ID: 9163412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A longer paper gathers more citations.
Ball P
Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7211):274-5. PubMed ID: 18800099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Female researchers are treated unfairly in spite of equal publishing].
Chrapkowska C
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(25):2881; author reply 2881. PubMed ID: 12143150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
Ploegh H
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.
Suo Q
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25794900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Row erupts over university's use of research metrics in job-cut decisions.
Else H
Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7852):19. PubMed ID: 33767466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
Lahiri DK
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):715. PubMed ID: 18843325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Older scientists publish more papers.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7217):1161. PubMed ID: 18985864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Supporting the future.
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
Biagioli M
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
