BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562287)

  • 1. Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate gleason score?
    Kunz GM; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2003 Sep; 34(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 14562287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
    Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
    Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
    Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?
    Rubin MA; Dunn R; Kambham N; Misick CP; O'Toole KM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1634-40. PubMed ID: 11117784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites.
    Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Mod Pathol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 15475927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
    Karram S; Trock BJ; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
    Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).
    Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
    Dean LW; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Al-Ahmadie HA; Chen YB; Gopalan A; Sirintrapun SJ; Tickoo SK; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Reuter VE; Ehdaie B; Fine SW
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 30076908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ability of sextant biopsies to predict radical prostatectomy stage.
    Wills ML; Sauvageot J; Partin AW; Gurganus R; Epstein JI
    Urology; 1998 May; 51(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 9610589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer?
    Fernandes ET; Sundaram CP; Long R; Soltani M; Ercole CJ
    Br J Urol; 1997 Apr; 79(4):615-7. PubMed ID: 9126095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
    Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
    BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.