These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1456230)

  • 1. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
    Burke M; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in the vertical dimension of Class II Division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear.
    Zervas ED; Galang-Boquiren MT; Obrez A; Costa Viana MG; Oppermann N; Sanchez F; Romero EG; Kusnoto B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):771-781. PubMed ID: 27871703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative long term post-treatment changes in hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 patients with early cervical traction treatment.
    Junkin JB; Andria LM
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11843274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.