These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562479)
1. [Law 9/2003, of April 25, establishing the legal procedure of confined utilization, voluntary liberation, and commercialization of genetically modified organisms]. Carlos J; De España R Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (18):223-48. PubMed ID: 14562479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cartagena protocol and GMOs. Pythoud F Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1347-8. PubMed ID: 15529146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. European incoherence on GMO cultivation versus importation. Tagliabue G Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):694-5. PubMed ID: 27404873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary: Emerging technologies oversight: research, regulation, and commercialization. Johnson R J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 20122101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetically modified organisms and the EU. Jank B; Rath J; Spök A Trends Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):222-4. PubMed ID: 15865998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the European Union: principles of risk assessment. Anadón A; Roda L; Martínez-Larrañaga MR Vet Hum Toxicol; 2004 Dec; 46(6):340-1. PubMed ID: 15587259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law. Kershen DL GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 26618752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Another inconvenient truth. In Europe, no one apparently wants to listen if you have good news about genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1330. PubMed ID: 18066008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The EU law on genetically modified organisms: the European Commission changes the strategy in order to allow, restrict, or prohibit its culture]. González Vaqué L Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2010; (33):217-40. PubMed ID: 21510337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive. Van Overwalle G Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Establishment of the bill on living modified organisms (LMOs) and its background]. Yoda J Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2004 Mar; 49(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15024846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An inconvenient version of events. Monastra G Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):379; discussion 379-80. PubMed ID: 18392011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mexican biotechnology. New law could turn scientists into outlaws. Mann CC Science; 2002 May; 296(5573):1591. PubMed ID: 12040156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetics and law: a challenge for lawyers and judges in the new millennium. Chin MW Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):103-15. PubMed ID: 15505919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial: a call for ethical regulation of genetically created organisms (GCOs) beyond GMOs. Lee SY Biotechnol J; 2010 Aug; 5(8):791. PubMed ID: 20672287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]