These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14562538)

  • 21. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.
    Leclet H
    Eur Spine J; 1994; 3(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 7866844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metal artifact reduction in MRI-based cervical cancer intracavitary brachytherapy.
    Rao YJ; Zoberi JE; Kadbi M; Grigsby PW; Cammin J; Mackey SL; Garcia-Ramirez J; Goddu SM; Schwarz JK; Gach HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(8):3011-3024. PubMed ID: 28306556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging Around Arthroplasty Implants: The Negative Effect of Long Echo Trains on the Implant-Related Artifact.
    Kumar NM; de Cesar Netto C; Schon LC; Fritz J
    Invest Radiol; 2017 May; 52(5):310-316. PubMed ID: 28079703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
    Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advances in MRI around metal.
    Jungmann PM; Agten CA; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):972-991. PubMed ID: 28342291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resolution adapted finite element modeling of radio frequency interactions on conductive resonant structures in MRI.
    Ruoff J; Würslin C; Graf H; Schick F
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 May; 67(5):1444-52. PubMed ID: 22076824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preparation of an Au-Pt alloy free from artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kodama T; Nakai R; Goto K; Shima K; Iwata H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():38-45. PubMed ID: 28700894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images.
    Port JD; Pomper MG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(6):958-64. PubMed ID: 11105718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Compressed Sensing SEMAC: 8-fold Accelerated High Resolution Metal Artifact Reduction MRI of Cobalt-Chromium Knee Arthroplasty Implants.
    Fritz J; Ahlawat S; Demehri S; Thawait GK; Raithel E; Gilson WD; Nittka M
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):666-76. PubMed ID: 27518214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
    Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
    Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correction of MR image distortions induced by metallic objects using a 3D cubic B-spline basis set: application to stereotactic surgical planning.
    Skare S; Andersson JL
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jul; 54(1):169-81. PubMed ID: 15968661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adverse effects of metallic artifacts on voxel-wise analysis and tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging.
    Goto M; Abe O; Hata J; Fukunaga I; Shimoji K; Kunimatsu A; Gomi T
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 27069095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implantable microstimulator: magnetic resonance safety at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Cosendai G; Park SM; Nyenhuis JA
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):591-9. PubMed ID: 15377938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants.
    Viano AM; Gronemeyer SA; Haliloglu M; Hoffer FA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Apr; 18(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 10745138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects on MRI due to altered rf polarization near conductive implants or instruments.
    Graf H; Steidle G; Martirosian P; Lauer UA; Schick F
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 16485418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimizing ferromagnetic artefact with metallic lumbar total disc arthroplasty devices at adjacent segments: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Strong G; Trewhella M; Kasis A; Friesem T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 20081522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.