These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation. Jensen DA J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):619-23. PubMed ID: 18667653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology outcome in ovum recipients. Luna M; Finkler E; Barritt J; Bar-Chama N; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Grunfeld L Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1772-5. PubMed ID: 19539905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [New bioethical issues since London and Paris]. Nau JY Rev Med Suisse; 2008 May; 4(159):1364. PubMed ID: 18592732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A suitable method for chromosomal preparations from foetal tissue arising from induced abortions. al-Sabti K Cytobios; 1990; 64(257):103-9. PubMed ID: 2076625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial gametes: new paths to parenthood? Newson AJ; Smajdor AC J Med Ethics; 2005 Mar; 31(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 15738444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Assisted reproductive technologies. Clinical and biological aspects and ethical considerations]. Deffieux X Rev Prat; 2004 Jun; 54(12):1375-82. PubMed ID: 15461060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Gender "tailored" conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology? Merhi ZO; Pal L J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):590-3. PubMed ID: 18667646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stem cells: potential cures or abortion lures? Janosky VJ DePaul J Health Care Law; 2002; 6(1):111-57. PubMed ID: 15069977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 14: equity of access to assisted reproductive technology. ; Pennings G; de Wert G; Shenfield F; Cohen J; Tarlatzis B; Devroey P Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):772-4. PubMed ID: 18321893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Theorizing waste in abortion and fetal ovarian tissue use. Arris R Can J Women Law; 2003; 15(2):255-81. PubMed ID: 16506333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Should man's age be a limiting factor in the ART management of the infertile couple?]. Jardin A Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 17507276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Results of assisted reproductive techniques in France: are we, really, so bad?]. Belaisch-Allart J Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 17392013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The ART of assisted reproductive technology. Persson J Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Mar; 34(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 15799656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genetic screening in 2,710 infertile candidate couples for assisted reproductive techniques: results of application of Italian guidelines for the appropriate use of genetic tests. Riccaboni A; Lalatta F; Caliari I; Bonetti S; Somigliana E; Ragni G Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):800-8. PubMed ID: 17681314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of major congenital malformations associated with infertility and its treatment by extent of iatrogenic intervention. Farhi J; Fisch B Pediatr Endocrinol Rev; 2007 Jun; 4(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 17643083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]