255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14563405)
1. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the skin sensitising potency of the lower alkyl methacrylate esters.
Kimber I; Pemberton MA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Oct; 70(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 24956587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment.
Loveless SE; Api AM; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Gamer A; Jowsey IR; Kern P; Kimber I; Lea L; Lloyd P; Mehmood Z; Steiling W; Veenstra G; Woolhiser M; Hennes C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 19733604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin sensitisation testing--new perspectives and recommendations.
Steiling W; Basketter D; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Kimber I; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 11295477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of guinea pig data to obtain starting points for skin sensitisation risk assessment - A commentary.
Basketter D; Corea N; Corvaro M; Grivel A; Kluxen FM; Morgan N; Wiemann C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Mar; 148():105584. PubMed ID: 38417477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behaviour of chemical respiratory allergens in novel predictive methods for skin sensitisation.
Basketter D; Poole A; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():101-106. PubMed ID: 28274809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Building confidence in skin sensitisation potency assessment using new approach methodologies: report of the 3rd EPAA Partners Forum, Brussels, 28th October 2019.
Basketter D; Beken S; Bender H; Bridges J; Casati S; Corvaro M; Cuvellier S; Hubesch B; Irizar A; Jacobs MN; Kern P; Lamplmair F; Manou I; Müller BP; Roggeband R; Rossi LH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Nov; 117():104767. PubMed ID: 32866543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin sensitisation.
Basketter D; Casati S; Gerberick GF; Griem P; Philips B; Worth A
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():83-103. PubMed ID: 16194142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chemical applicability domain of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 4. Quantitative correlation of LLNA potency with human potency.
Roberts DW; Api AM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jul; 96():76-84. PubMed ID: 29730445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of selected valid and mechanistically based SARs for skin sensitisation.
Fabjan E; Hulzebos E
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Mar; 22(2):468-90. PubMed ID: 18494147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The activity of methacrylate esters in skin sensitisation test methods II. A review of complementary and additional analyses.
Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 119():104821. PubMed ID: 33186628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specificity of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation.
Roberts DW; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jun; 141():105402. PubMed ID: 37116738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
