98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14563609)
1. [Psychological adjustment of short interval follow-up mammography: about 50 cases].
Barreau B; Tastet S; Stinès J; Picot V; Guibert-Tamisier L; Brault I; Gillet JM; Fawzi M; Audigey I; Pousse T; Dilhuydy MH
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003; 31(7-8):629-38. PubMed ID: 14563609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress.
Lindfors KK; O'Connor J; Acredolo CR; Liston SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9648763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress response syndromes in women undergoing mammography: a comparison of women with and without a history of breast cancer.
Gurevich M; Devins GM; Wilson C; McCready D; Marmar CR; Rodin GM
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 14747644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anxiety and specific distress in women at intermediate and high risk of breast cancer before and after surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging and mammography versus standard mammography.
Brédart A; Kop JL; Fall M; Pelissier S; Simondi C; Dolbeault S; Livartowski A; Tardivon A;
Psychooncology; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1185-94. PubMed ID: 21812069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk in Imaging-Detected Low-Risk Scenarios and Thresholds for Desired Intervention: A Multi-Institution Survey.
Grimm LJ; Shelby RA; Knippa EE; Langman EL; Miller LS; Whiteside BE; Soo MSC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jun; 15(6):911-919. PubMed ID: 29606632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.
Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Hagell P; Wann-Hansson C
J Clin Nurs; 2014 Jul; 23(13-14):2053-62. PubMed ID: 24313329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?
Walter LC; Eng C; Covinsky KE
J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 16(11):779-84. PubMed ID: 11722693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceived risk prior to mammography as an independent predictor of breast cancer.
Nielsen NB; Zachariae R; Hjollund NH
J Psychosom Res; 2009 Mar; 66(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 19232237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process.
Almog R; Hagoel L; Tamir A; Barnett O; Rennert G
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18319148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why do women's attitudes toward mammography change over time? Implications for physician-patient communication.
Pearlman DN; Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B; Rimer BK; Goldstein MG; Woolverton H; Dube CE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Jun; 6(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 9184780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pain and anxiety related to mammography in breast cancer patients. Psychological evaluation in an experimental study].
Caruso A; Efficace F; Parrila A; Angelone L; Ferranti F; Grandinetti ML
Radiol Med; 2001; 102(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 11779980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain during mammography: the role of coping strategies.
Asghari A; Nicholas MK
Pain; 2004 Mar; 108(1-2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15109521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of life, coping strategies, social support and self-efficacy in women after acute myocardial infarction: a mixed methods approach.
Fuochi G; Foà C
Scand J Caring Sci; 2018 Mar; 32(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 28205256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
Brett J; Austoker J
J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on the management of patients following detection of a "probably benign" mammographic abnormality (ACR BI-RADS category 3): a review of 176 radiologists].
Barreau B; Tastet S; Picot V; Deghaye M; Brault I; Marelle P; Aucant D; Haber S
J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 85(11):1927-36. PubMed ID: 15602415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
