150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14563734)
21. Who--and how--to kill are focus of US death penalty cases. Questions about prisoners' mental competence and use of pancuronium bromide ignite recent controversy.
Oransky I
Lancet; 2003 Oct; 362(9392):1287. PubMed ID: 14577434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
Fitch WL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A joint statement: Stop the execution of persons with mental retardation.
Perske R
Ment Retard; 2001 Aug; 39(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 11448255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. US court rules that insane prisoners can be executed.
Gottlieb S
BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):415. PubMed ID: 12595366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Dannie Abse.
Abse D
Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9380):336. PubMed ID: 12892982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Dementia and the Death Penalty.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Nov; 49(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 31813185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
Shin H
Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Penry revisited: is execution of a person who has mental retardation cruel and unusual?
Herbert PB; Young KA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 12108566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
Herbert PB; Meyers JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Psychiatrists and capital sentencing: risks and responsibilities in a unique legal setting.
Showalter CR; Bonnie RJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 6743848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Individualizing justice after Atkins.
Brakel SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 16585243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Some contrarian concerns about law, psychology, and public policy.
Bersoff DN
Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 12412498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The DSM in litigation and legislation.
Slovenko R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 21389161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. US Supreme Court ruling affirms strict criteria for involuntary medication of defendants to gain competency.
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Aug; 54(8):1177. PubMed ID: 12934580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Law & psychiatry: Death row delusions: when is a prisoner competent to be executed?
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2007 Oct; 58(10):1258-60. PubMed ID: 17913998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding.
Ragatz L; Vitacco MJ; Tross R
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Dec; 59(14):1505-19. PubMed ID: 25080435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
