These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14564022)

  • 1. Non-additive genetic effects in animal selection.
    Łukaszewicz M
    J Appl Genet; 2001; 42(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 14564022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results.
    Varona L; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2186-91. PubMed ID: 10531605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding.
    Christensen OF; Legarra A; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():98. PubMed ID: 26694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A general framework for marker-assisted selection.
    Hu XS
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Jun; 71(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 17383700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of dominance effects on sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Puonti M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Dec; 123(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 17177689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic effects on preweaning weight gain of Nelore-Hereford calves according to different models and estimation methods.
    Carvalheiro R; Pimentel EC; Cardoso V; Queiroz SA; Fries LA
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 84(11):2925-33. PubMed ID: 17032785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme.
    Ibáñez-Escriche N; Reixach J; Lleonart N; Noguera JL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3881-9. PubMed ID: 21841081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.