489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14564289)
1. Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures.
Song HY; Yi YJ; Cho LR; Park DY
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 14564289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced adhesive fixed partial inlay dentures.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Leibrock A; Schneider-Feyrer S; Handel G
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10071475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of inlay-retained adhesive fixed partial dentures after mechanical and thermal stress: an in vitro study.
Göehring TN; Peters OA; Lutz F
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 11458266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year clinical and SEM evaluation of glass-fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures.
Göhring TN; Schmidlin PR; Lutz F
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12074228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
Ozcan M; Breuklander MH; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15798684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems.
Kolbeck C; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 12501138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2 bonding systems and survival of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures.
Monaco C; Ferrari M; Caldari M; Baldissara P; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 17165297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of retainer design on two-unit cantilever resin-bonded glass fiber reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.
Keulemans F; De Jager N; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 19058681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
Edelhoff D; Spiekermann H; Yildirim M
Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):269-81. PubMed ID: 12066646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Cho L; Choi J; Yi YJ; Park CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 15211298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
Monaco C; Krejci I; Bortolotto T; Perakis N; Ferrari M; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of artificial aging on the fracture strength and stiffness of Targis/Vectris fixed partial dentures.
Baldissara P; Parisi C; Monaco C; Scotti R
Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 17263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures: the influence of restorative materials and abutment design on stress distribution investigated by finite element model.
Rappelli G; Scalise L; Coccia E; Procaccini M
Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Oct; 58(10):459-70. PubMed ID: 19893471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design.
Magne P; Perakis N; Belser UC; Krejci I
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):516-27. PubMed ID: 12070515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fracture resistance of four-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Schulz K; Borchers L
Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 16143379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced-composite versus glass-fibre-reinforced-composite fixed partial dentures.
Kolbeck C; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jul; 29(7):668-74. PubMed ID: 12153457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth without posts.
Göhring TN; Peters OA
Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 14677609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses with various pontics.
Perea L; Matinlinna JP; Tolvanen M; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 24179988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of different cavity designs on fracture load of fiber-reinforced adhesive fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region.
Aktas G; Basara EG; Sahin E; Uctasli S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 23534008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
