These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14564336)

  • 1. Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sensky PR; Loubani M; Keal RP; Samani NJ; Sosnowski AW; Galiñanes M
    Am Heart J; 2003 Oct; 146(4):E13. PubMed ID: 14564336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of postoperative blood pressure control on regression of left ventricular mass following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Imanaka K; Kohmoto O; Nishimura S; Yokote Y; Kyo S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 27(6):994-9. PubMed ID: 15896607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A; Benedetto U; Sciangula A; Merico E; Barberi F; Bianchini R; Tonelli E; Sinatra R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with CryoLife-O'Brien stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Gelsomino S; Frassani R; Morocutti G; Porreca L; Tursi V; Masullo G; Lumini R; Livi U
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Sep; 10(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 11603600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Collinson J; Flather M; Coats AJ; Pepper JR; Henein M
    Int J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 97(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 15561345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiologic compensation is supranormal in compensated aortic stenosis: does it return to normal after aortic valve replacement or is it blunted by coexistent coronary artery disease? An intramyocardial magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Biederman RW; Doyle M; Yamrozik J; Williams RB; Rathi VK; Vido D; Caruppannan K; Osman N; Bress V; Rayarao G; Biederman CM; Mankad S; Magovern JA; Reichek N
    Circulation; 2005 Aug; 112(9 Suppl):I429-36. PubMed ID: 16159858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Rajappan K; Melina G; Bellenger NG; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Pennell DJ; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):60-5; discussion 66. PubMed ID: 11843507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.
    Sádaba JR; Herregods MC; Bogaert J; Harringer W; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 23409363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after stentless versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
    Walther T; Falk V; Langebartels G; Krüger M; Schilling L; Diegeler A; Gummert J; Autschbach R; Mohr FW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10660161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kato Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Sasaki Y; Hirai H
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left ventricular mass: impact on left ventricular contractile function and its reversibility in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
    Taniguchi K; Takahashi T; Toda K; Matsue H; Shudo Y; Shintani H; Mitsuno M; Sawa Y
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Oct; 32(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 17689973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients over 55 years old with different valve types.
    Ozatik MA; Göl MK; Yildiz U; Göksel S; Yurdakök O; Yavas S; Tufekcioğlu O; Sener E; Tasdemir O
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Feb; 9(2):CR55-60. PubMed ID: 12601287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
    Narang S; Satsangi DK; Banerjee A; Geelani MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 136(4):943-7. PubMed ID: 18954634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; Dalla Tomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1291-6; discussion 1296. PubMed ID: 15797064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Cartier PA; Kon N; Johnson KG; Dumesnil JG; Doty DB;
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11805953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Lemire MS; Eberhart D; Armstrong WF; Deeb GM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 10947047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.