210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14565728)
1. UK laboratory intercomparison on internal dosimetry.
Speed J; Birchall A; Bull R; Cockerill R; Jarvis NS; Marsh JW; Peace MS; Roberts G; Scarlett C; Spencer D; Stewart P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 14565728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Criticality accident dosimetry systems: an international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor in 2002.
Médioni R; Asselineau B; Verrey B; Trompier F; Itié C; Texier C; Muller H; Pelcot G; Clairand I; Jacquet X; Pochat JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):429-36. PubMed ID: 15353686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dosimetry measurements for the international intercomparison of criticality accident dosimetry SILENE 9-21 June 2002.
Asselineau B; Trompier F; Texier C; Itié C; Médioni R; Tikunov D; Muller H; Pelcot G;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):459-64. PubMed ID: 15353691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International intercomparison for criticality dosimetry: the case of biological dosimetry.
Roy L; Buard V; Delbos M; Durand V; Paillole N; Grégoire E; Voisin P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):471-6. PubMed ID: 15353693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EPR dosimetry in a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field.
Trompier F; Fattibene P; Tikunov D; Bartolotta A; Carosi A; Doca MC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):437-42. PubMed ID: 15353687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Czech results at criticality dosimetry intercomparison 2002.
Frantisek S; Jaroslav T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):455-8. PubMed ID: 15353690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intercomparison on the usage of computational codes in radiation dosimetry.
Tanner RJ; Chartier JL; Siebert BR; Agosteo S; Grosswendt B; Gualdrini G; Kodeli I; Leuthold GP; Ménard S; Price RA; Tagziria H; Terrissol M; Zankl M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):769-80. PubMed ID: 15353746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criticality accident dosimetry by chromosomal analysis.
Voisin P; Roy L; Hone PA; Edwards AA; Lloyd DC; Stephan G; Romm H; Groer PG; Brame R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):443-7. PubMed ID: 15353688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemical dosimetry system for criticality accidents.
Miljanić S; Ilijas B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):477-81. PubMed ID: 15353694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ENEA criticality accident dosimetry system: a contribution to the 2002 international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor.
Gualdrini G; Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Mariotti F;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15353692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weighting factors for radiation quality: how to unite the two current concepts.
Kellerer AM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):781-7. PubMed ID: 15353747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lessons learned from interlaboratory comparisons of bioassay data interpretation.
Doerfel H; Andrasi A; Bailey M; Berkovski V; Castellani CM; Hurtgen C; Jourdain JR; LeGuen B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):427-32. PubMed ID: 14527002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Italian intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment.
Castellani CM; Luciani A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):443-6. PubMed ID: 14527005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Present and future activities of the IAEA on internal dosimetry: lessons learned from international intercomparisons.
Cruz Suárez R; Gustafsson M; Mrabit K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):433-5. PubMed ID: 14527003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of the ICRP's dose coefficients for members of the public. III. Plutonium as a case study of uncertainties in the systemic biokinetics of radionuclides.
Leggett RW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(2):103-20. PubMed ID: 14653331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computational tool based on voxel geometry for dose reconstruction of a radiological accident due to external exposure.
Lemosquet A; Clairand I; de Carlan L; Franck D; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Bottollier-Depois JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15353689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Half a century of internal dosimetry.
Stather JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14653330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. On uncertainties and errors.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 15492066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using operational equipment to read accident dosemeters.
Devine RT; Vigil MM; Martinez WA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):699-700. PubMed ID: 15353733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
