120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14566093)
1. Statistical properties of affected sib-pair linkage tests.
Wu CC; Amos CI
Hum Hered; 2003; 55(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 14566093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
Schaid DJ; Nick TG
Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: sib pair screening tests for linkage.
Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14968835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of family structure on the power of linkage tests using sib-pair methods.
Goddard KA; Goode EL; Rozek LS; Jarvik GP
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S575-9. PubMed ID: 10597495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
Knapp M; Strauch K
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.
Sribney WM; Swift M
Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Oct; 51(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 1415221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using overall allele-sharing to detect the presence of large-scale data errors and parameter misspecification in sib-pair linkage studies.
Olson JM; Song Y; Lu Q; Wedig GC; Goddard KA
Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
Tierney C; McKnight B
Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved sib-pair linkage test for disease susceptibility loci.
Faraway JJ
Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 8224803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of uninformative families in mean allele sharing tests for linkage.
Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Wang T; Elston RC; Weeks DE
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article13. PubMed ID: 17049024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sibship T2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers.
Fan R; Knapp M
Hum Genomics; 2005 Jun; 2(2):90-112. PubMed ID: 16004725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
Yang Y; Ott J
Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
