These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14566103)

  • 1. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?
    Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(6):322-37. PubMed ID: 14566103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral response patterns of auditory cortex neurons to harmonic complex tones in alert monkey (Macaca mulatta).
    Schwarz DW; Tomlinson RW
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Jul; 64(1):282-98. PubMed ID: 2388072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N100m in adults possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1383-6. PubMed ID: 15194857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex.
    Rif J; Hari R; Hämäläinen MS; Sams M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Dec; 79(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 1721574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
    Kawase T; Maki A; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Sato M; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
    Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuromagnetic responses associated with perceptual segregation of pitch.
    Johnson BW; Muthukumaraswamy SD; Hautus MJ; Gaetz WC; Cheyne DO
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():33. PubMed ID: 16012630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.