77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14566129)
1. The esophageal Doppler monitor in mechanically ventilated surgical patients: does it work?
Seoudi HM; Perkal MF; Hanrahan A; Angood PB
J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):720-5; discussion 725-6. PubMed ID: 14566129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esophageal Doppler ultrasound monitor versus pulmonary artery catheter in the hemodynamic management of critically ill surgical patients.
Madan AK; UyBarreta VV; Aliabadi-Wahle S; Jesperson R; Hartz RS; Flint LM; Steinberg SM
J Trauma; 1999 Apr; 46(4):607-11; discussion 611-2. PubMed ID: 10217222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-Aided Quantitative Ultrasonography for Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Surgery Patients.
Corradi F; Brusasco C; Vezzani A; Santori G; Manca T; Ball L; Nicolini F; Gherli T; Brusasco V
Chest; 2016 Sep; 150(3):640-51. PubMed ID: 27130285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of esophageal Doppler for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring under pneumoperitoneum.
Okrainec A; Bergman S; Demyttenaere S; Feldman LS; Nutting A; Carli F; Fried GM
Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1349-53. PubMed ID: 17235722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esophageal Doppler monitor determinations of cardiac output and preload during cardiac operations.
DiCorte CJ; Latham P; Greilich PE; Cooley MV; Grayburn PA; Jessen ME
Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 Jun; 69(6):1782-6. PubMed ID: 10892923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of non-invasive esophageal echo-Doppler system in the ICU: a practical experience.
Stawicki SP; Hoff WS; Cipolla J; deQuevedo R
J Trauma; 2005 Aug; 59(2):506-7. PubMed ID: 16294103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients.
Waldron NH; Miller TE; Thacker JK; Manchester AK; White WD; Nardiello J; Elgasim MA; Moon RE; Gan TJ
Anesth Analg; 2014 May; 118(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 24681660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac Output Assessments in Anesthetized Children: Dynamic Capnography Versus Esophageal Doppler.
Karlsson J; Svedmyr A; Wiegele M; Lönnqvist PA; Wallin M; Hallbäck M
Anesth Analg; 2022 Mar; 134(3):644-652. PubMed ID: 34304235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Intrathoracic blood volume versus pulmonary artery occlusion pressure as estimators of cardiac preload in critically ill patients].
Tomicic V; Graf J; Echevarría G; Espinoza M; Abarca J; Montes JM; Torres J; Núñez G; Guerrero J; Luppi M; Canals C
Rev Med Chil; 2005 Jun; 133(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 16075124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring measurement biases associated with esophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill patients in intensive care unit.
Stawicki PS; Braslow B; Gracias VH
Ann Thorac Med; 2007 Oct; 2(4):148-53. PubMed ID: 19727365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic responses to external counterbalancing of auto-positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Baigorri F; de Monte A; Blanch L; Fernández R; Vallés J; Mestre J; Saura P; Artigas A
Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1782-91. PubMed ID: 7956282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of intraoperative arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Lu JK; Zhu C; Jing H; Wang YJ; Qing EM
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jun; 125(12):2099-103. PubMed ID: 22884136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global and right ventricular end-diastolic volumes correlate better with preload after correction for ejection fraction.
Malbrain ML; De Potter TJ; Dits H; Reuter DA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 May; 54(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 20085545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of hemodynamic data derived by pulmonary artery flotation catheter and the esophageal Doppler monitor in preeclampsia.
Penny JA; Anthony J; Shennan AH; De Swiet M; Singer M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 183(3):658-61. PubMed ID: 10992189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.
Desebbe O; Boucau C; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20185658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
