These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14566315)

  • 1. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
    Leske DA; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2004 Feb; 8(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14970796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
    Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
    J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test--retest variability of Randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children.
    Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 22317911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitfalls in the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.
    Sitko KR; Peragallo JH; Bidot S; Biousse V; Newman NJ; Bruce BB
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Jan; 123(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 26481817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study on the clinical usefulness of digitalized random-dot stereoacuity test.
    Yang JW; Son MH; Yun IH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 15635829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis.
    Chopin A; Chan SW; Guellai B; Bavelier D; Levi DM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5789. PubMed ID: 30962466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoacuity testing in the monofixation syndrome.
    Clarke WN; Noel LP
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1990; 27(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 2366128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
    Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereoacuity norms in young children.
    Simons K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Mar; 99(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 7213162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Near stereoacuity: development in preschool children; normative values and screening for binocular vision abnormalities; a study of 115 children.
    Tomaç S; Altay Y
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 10960225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
    Webber AL; Wood JM; Thompson B; Birch EE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30628744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randot stereoacuity testing in young children.
    Kulp MT; Mitchell GL
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2005; 42(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 16382561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randot stereoacuity does not accurately predict ability to perform two practical tests of depth perception at a near distance.
    Long J; Siu C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 16276324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of stereoacuity outcomes at ages 1 to 24 months: Randot Stereocards.
    Birch EE; Morale SE; Jeffrey BG; O'Connor AR; Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Feb; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15729278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
    Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.