139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14566794)
1. A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone.
Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Nov; 67(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 14566794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants.
Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting--tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants.
Rønold HJ; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2002 Nov; 23(21):4211-9. PubMed ID: 12194524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits.
Gotfredsen K; Wennerberg A; Johansson C; Skovgaard LT; Hjørting-Hansen E
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Oct; 29(10):1223-31. PubMed ID: 8557724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo.
Guo J; Padilla RJ; Ambrose W; De Kok IJ; Cooper LF
Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(36):5418-25. PubMed ID: 17868850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-level laser therapy stimulates bone-implant interaction: an experimental study in rabbits.
Khadra M; Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE; Haanaes HR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 15142095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis.
Mustafa K; Wroblewski J; Hultenby K; Lopez BS; Arvidson K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):116-28. PubMed ID: 11168202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test.
Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2003 Nov; 24(25):4559-64. PubMed ID: 12950998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.
Goldberg VM; Stevenson S; Feighan J; Davy D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):122-9. PubMed ID: 7554621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone.
Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone.
Mustafa K; Wennerberg A; Wroblewski J; Hultenby K; Lopez BS; Arvidson K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 11564113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants.
Götz HE; Müller M; Emmel A; Holzwarth U; Erben RG; Stangl R
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4057-64. PubMed ID: 15046896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
