These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14568095)

  • 1. Face processing in 8-month-old infants: evidence for configural and analytical processing.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2783-93. PubMed ID: 14568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of facial identity discrimination through learned attention.
    Simpson EA; Jakobsen KV; Fragaszy DM; Okada K; Frick JE
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Jul; 56(5):1083-101. PubMed ID: 24395087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G; Avidan G; Ganel T
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Newborns discriminate schematic faces from scrambled faces.
    Easterbrook MA; Kisilevsky BS; Muir DW; Laplante DP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Sep; 53(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 10504887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia.
    Kilgour AR; de Gelder B; Lederman SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15037050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli.
    Rosa-Salva O; Regolin L; Vallortigara G
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jul; 13(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 20590721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A contextual effect of 2nd-order configural processing of non-face objects by non-experts.
    Matheson HE; McMullen PA
    Perception; 2009; 38(7):1072-86. PubMed ID: 19764308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infants' discrimination of faces by using biological motion cues.
    Spencer J; O'Brien J; Johnston A; Hill H
    Perception; 2006; 35(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 16491710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Newborns' recognition of changing and unchanging aspects of schematic faces.
    Turati C; Simion F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(4):239-61. PubMed ID: 12470960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy.
    Bertin E; Bhatt RS
    Dev Sci; 2004 Sep; 7(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 15484591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.