These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14568095)

  • 21. Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.
    Amishav R; Kimchi R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 21037176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!
    Itier RJ; Alain C; Sedore K; McIntosh AR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1815-26. PubMed ID: 17958484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces.
    Schwaninger A; Ryf S; Hofer F
    Vision Res; 2003 Jun; 43(14):1501-5. PubMed ID: 12782063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How face specialization emerges in the first months of life.
    Simion F; Leo I; Turati C; Valenza E; Dalla Barba B
    Prog Brain Res; 2007; 164():169-85. PubMed ID: 17920431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Where and how infants look: the development of scan paths and fixations in face perception.
    Kato M; Konishi Y
    Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb; 36(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23261787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
    Flowe HD; Smith HM; Karoğlu N; Onwuegbusi TO; Rai L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The ups and downs of face perception: evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.
    Murray JE
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 15222387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
    McKone E; Peh YX
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Face and body perception in schizophrenia: a configural processing deficit?
    Soria Bauser D; Thoma P; Aizenberg V; Brüne M; Juckel G; Daum I
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Jan; 195(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 21803427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identity processing in multiple-face tracking.
    Ren D; Chen W; Liu CH; Fu X
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):18.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Infants' perception of natural and distorted arrangements of a schematic face.
    Maurer D; Barrera M
    Child Dev; 1981 Mar; 52(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 7238143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence of human-like, holistic face processing in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).
    Taubert J
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20175597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemispheric differences in processing emotions and faces.
    Ley RG; Bryden MP
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jan; 7(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 435972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.