These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14568627)

  • 1. Assessment of agreement of a quantitative variable: a new graphical approach.
    Luiz RR; Costa AJ; Kale PL; Werneck GL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 56(10):963-7. PubMed ID: 14568627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement Analysis: What He Said, She Said Versus You Said.
    Vetter TR; Schober P
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):2123-2128. PubMed ID: 29677066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of fetal renal pelvis volume assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography with two different measurement techniques.
    Duin LK; Willekes C; Vossen M; Offermans J; Nijhuis JG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 23325421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison.
    Bland JM; Altman DG
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Jan; 116(1):182-5. PubMed ID: 22129533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications.
    Gisev N; Bell JS; Chen TF
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 22695215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel graphical evaluation of agreement.
    Kim J; Lee JH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 35184729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essentials of Statistical Methods for Assessing Reliability and Agreement in Quantitative Imaging.
    Anvari A; Halpern EF; Samir AE
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 29241596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practical approach to Bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables.
    Euser AM; Dekker FW; le Cessie S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):978-82. PubMed ID: 18468854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of fetal renal pelvis volume measurement using three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Duin LK; Willekes C; Vossen M; Beckers M; Offermans J; Nijhuis JG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 18470970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of analysis-of-variance-based methods to quantify the random variations of observers in medical imaging measurements: guidelines to the investigator.
    Zeggelink WF; Hart AA; Gilhuijs KG
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 15305452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic Response Assessment in Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Computed-Assisted Volume Evaluation.
    Orsatti G; Beltrame V; Crimì F; Frigo AC; Bisogno G; Stramare R
    J Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 182():327-334.e2. PubMed ID: 27939125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphical aids for visualizing and interpreting patterns in departures from agreement in ordinal categorical observer agreement data.
    Bangdiwala SI
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):773-783. PubMed ID: 28010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater agreement between visual analysts of single-case data: a meta-analysis.
    Ninci J; Vannest KJ; Willson V; Zhang N
    Behav Modif; 2015 Jul; 39(4):510-41. PubMed ID: 25878161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method.
    Armstrong SM; Miller JM; Benson K; Jain S; Panagopoulos K; DeLancey JO; Sampselle CM
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 16897749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
    Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two diverse measurement methods by graphical agreement.
    Stosovic MD; Raskovic SS; Marinkovic JM
    Ren Fail; 2012; 34(9):1091-4. PubMed ID: 22906297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical tools to improve assessing agreement between several observers.
    Ruddat I; Scholz B; Bergmann S; Buehring AL; Fischer S; Manton A; Prengel D; Rauch E; Steiner S; Wiedmann S; Kreienbrock L; Campe A
    Animal; 2014 Apr; 8(4):643-9. PubMed ID: 24461060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival analytical techniques were used to assess agreement of a quantitative variable.
    Llorca J; Delgado-Rodríguez M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):314-5. PubMed ID: 15718122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.